TruthMatters
Where Did The Bible Come From
What books belong in
the Bible and what books do not?
The canon of scripture may be generally described as the “collection of books which form the original and authoritative written rule of the faith and practice of the early Christian Church”. This includes both the Old and New Testaments.
The Old Testament
Canon:
The Old Testament is primarily about the history of the Jewish people.
The earliest written word of God was the Ten Commandments.
God himself wrote on two tablets of stone the words which he commanded his
people: “And he gave to Moses, when he had made an end of speaking with him
upon Mount Sinai, the two tables of the testimony, tables of stone, written
with the finger of God” (Ex. 31:18). Again we read, “And the tables were
the work of God, and the writing was the writing of God graven upon the
tables” (Ex. 32:16; cf. Deut.
Jewish tradition indicates that Moses wrote the first 5 books of the Old Testement.
The Jewish religious leaders were the ones who determined which books were inspired by God and therefore should be followed. Those same books that the Jewish leaders accepted became what is called the Old Testament. There is no indication that Christ disagreed with the Jewish religious leaders about what books they had “accepted” as being inspired by God.
History of the Jewish people written after approximately 435 b.c. included such books as the Maccabees. These writers in their own writings indicated that they did not believe that their words were from God. These writings are called the Apocraypha.
The Dead Sea Scrolls that were found in 1947. They did not contain any information about Christ or Christianity. They were written by Jews about Jewish things. They included every book, complete book or parts of the book, of the Hebrew Bible except for the book of Ester.
The Apocrypha:
“Apocrypha” signifies a group of books or parts of books that are not part of the original Jewish canon of the Hebrew Scripture. These were written approximately between 300 b.c.e. to 70 c.e. These writings were not accepted by the Jewish leaders as having the same authority as the rest of their Scripture and were not included with the other books of the Old Testament.
In 1546, at the Council of Trent, the Roman Catholic Church officially declared the Apocrypha to be part of their Old Testament.
The writings of the Apocrypha should not be regarded as part of Scripture because: (1) they do not claim for themselves the same kind of authority as the Old Testament writings; (2) they were not regarded as God’s words by the Jewish people from whom they originated; (3) they were not considered to be Scripture by Jesus or the New Testament authors; and (4) they contain teachings inconsistent with the rest of the Bible. These are just history books of the Jewish people.
The New Testament:
The New Testament is primarily a history of Jesus and Christianity. It consists of 27 books that originally were letters that were written by someone to other people or churches.
There were 4 criteria for a book to be included into the New Testament.
1. The document had to be dated back to or near the time of Christ
2. The document had to be written by an apostle or his companion.
3. The document had to have a widespread acceptance among the established chruchs.
4. The document had to have views similar to the other accepted documents.
The apostles, by virtue of their apostolic office, were
given authority to write the words of Scripture. Those writings/letters were
written to the local congregations (or individuals) and were accepted by the
Christians and they were read and circulated with other congregations (or
individuals). Some writers even mentioned other letters (II Peter
The New Testament letters that were accepted because of their direct authorship by the apostles were Matthew; John; the Pauline epistles (except Hebrews); James;?? 1 and 2 Peter; 1, 2, 3 John; and Revelation.
This leaves five letters that became books in our New Testament (Mark, Luke, Acts, Hebrews, and Jude). The letters/books of Mark, Luke, and Acts were accepted very early because Mark was associated with the apostle Peter, and Luke (the author of Luke-Acts) was associated with the apostle Paul. Jude was accepted because of his connection with James (see Jude 1) and because he was the brother of Jesus.? Because of Hebrews 2:3, the authorship of Hebrews came into question by some; however, it was accepted because many in the early church believed it was written by Paul and because of its consistency with the rest of scripture.
Clement of
The earliest non-heretical canonical list is the Muratorian Canon (c A.D. 170). This list omits only Hebrews, James, 1 and 2 Peter and one of the epistles of John. There is a break in this manuscript that may once have included these books.
In June 325, the Roman emperor Constantine convened an ecumenical
council of about 250 Christian leaders at the city of
A man by the name of Eusebius wrote a book “Life of Constantine”. In it
he recorded that
In a.d. 367 Athanasius in his Thirty-ninth Paschal Letter stated that the twenty-seven New Testament books we have in our bible today were “divine” and all others should be destroyed. This list of books were already accepted by the churches in the eastern part of the Mediterranean world. Thirty years later, in a.d. 397, the churches in the western part of the Mediterranean world had the “Council of Carthage” and they agreed with the eastern churches on the same list. These are the earliest final lists of our present-day canon.
The Vulgate translation of the entire bible was translated from Greek and Hebrew into the Latin language and it was completed by 400 AD.
King James authorized the translated the Latin bible into English in 1611 and this translation was named after him, hence the “The King James” bible. Forty seven scholars undertook this task. They were given the task of translation of words, NOT to set policy or determine which books should be included because this had already determined for about 1,300 years.
Should we expect any more writings to be added to the canon? The opening sentence in Hebrews puts this question to rest. The answer is NO! “In many and various ways God spoke of old to our fathers by the prophets; but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world” (Heb. 1:1–2).